Fix an agenda so the meeting spends time on what matters
When to use
You're planning a meeting and want the time allocation to reflect actual importance.
What you'll get
A time-allocated agenda, identification of which items will attract disproportionate discussion, pre-read suggestions for complex items, and items to move out of the meeting.
The prompt
Here's the agenda for an upcoming meeting: [PASTE YOUR AGENDA]. Length: [LENGTH]. Attendees: [ROLES / SENIORITY LEVELS].
Groups consistently over-invest time in low-complexity items โ things everyone can have an opinion on โ and under-invest in high-complexity items where engaging requires real preparation. The simple items feel productive. The hard ones feel risky. So the meeting fills with the former.
Do four things: identify which items are most likely to attract disproportionate discussion relative to their importance; suggest a time allocation weighted by strategic significance rather than ease of discussion; for complex items likely to be under-discussed, suggest a framing or pre-read that lets participants engage with the substance rather than retreat to simpler sub-questions; flag any items to remove from the meeting and handle asynchronously.Why this prompt works
The pre-read requirement for hard items is the key practical intervention. Bikeshedding happens because the complex item arrives cold โ no one has thought about it โ so the group gravitates to what they can immediately engage with.
The psychology behind this
Bikeshedding
Read the full experiment โ47_bikeshedding.md